06/07/25: Denkmail No. 46 on the stationing of medium-range missiles in Germany (Berlin Appeal)
New US medium-range missiles in Germany?
Dear friends of peace,
A year ago, the then Chancellor Scholz tersely announced that the German and US governments had bilaterally agreed that the Americans would station new medium-range missiles in Germany from 2026 onwards.
These are offensive weapons of the types Standard Missiles (SM-6), cruise missiles (Tomahawk) and hypersonic weapons (Dark Eagle, 17 times the speed of sound), ranges of 1700 km up to 2800 km, conventional warheads, but in principle also nuclear-capable, under the sole command of the USA. Planning for this began in 2017, long before the Ukraine war.
In 2019, the USA announced its withdrawal from the existing INF Treaty, citing an alleged capability gap. The planned stationing is not linked to any disarmament offer.
Due to the capabilities of these weapons (extremely short warning times) and the proximity to Russia, this step represents a dangerous escalation of the arms spiral and an enormous threat, especially to Russia. In a joint declaration by Presidents Putin (Russia) and Xi (China) on 4 February 2022, the danger of a “decapitation strike” emanating from this is therefore mentioned. This also means an incalculable threat for Germany. Dr. Erich Vad, Brigadier General (ret.), therefore says: “The stationing agreement is not acceptable from a German and European point of view.”
Since this gigantic build-up has not even been discussed in the Bundestag or a resolution passed, a majority in Germany rejects the stationing (Forsa survey) and the corresponding Berlin Appeal has so far been signed by 60,000 people, a broad public discussion must be held on this threatening measure with all its implications.
If the Munich Security Conference (MSC) really wants to be an open forum for all security issues, it is essential that it be discussed there in a broad framework with proven experts from science, politics, peace work, citizens’ councils and also experienced military personnel (Erich Vad, Harald Kujat, Wolfgang Richter)! And please do not only invite those seasoned talk show participants who argue with war logic and are well-known from the media, such as Carlo Masala, Klaus Mölling, Claudia Major or Nicole Deitelhoff!
What do you think about this? We look forward to hearing your views!
With peaceful greetings
Erwin Schelbert
Newsletter No. 23 on the Munich Security Conference 2025
Dear friends of peace,
From February 14-16, 2025, the 61st Munich Security Conference (MSC) will take place at the Bayerischer Hof. This year, the event will undoubtedly be shaped by how the Trump administration aligns U.S. foreign policy and what impact this will have on NATO and the war in Ukraine. Although the new Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, spoke in an interview about the benefits of a multipolar world, this does not necessarily mean the end of U.S. hegemony. The brutal approach President Trump pursues has already become evident with regard to tariff policies towards Canada, Mexico, and China, and the handling of Panama and Greenland.
The war in Ukraine has been raging for almost exactly three years. The loss of life and destruction of infrastructure in Ukraine, as well as the death and injury of soldiers on both sides, remain immense. Whether the US will hold substantive talks with Russia is still unclear. So far, there have only been lip service from the American president. There can currently only be speculation about talks already taking place behind the scenes.
The war in Israel/Palestine has led to particularly high casualties and disastrous destruction on the Palestinian side. There is currently a ceasefire in place, which is being used to exchange hostages and prisoners. How this very bloody conflict will develop further is currently unclear.
The entire EU has been more noticeable in the war in Ukraine and the war in Israel/Palestine through escalation and arms deliveries than through diplomacy and de-escalation. EU states have also played virtually no mediating – and certainly no moderating – role in the regime change in Syria, which was primarily prepared by the USA over many years: arms deliveries and sanctions have seemed to be the means of choice in the EU for several years. Diplomatic initiatives are barely discernible. Individual pioneers are quickly curbed (Spain, Hungary).
It remains to be hoped that the EU – and thus also Germany – will be more committed to compromise and conflict resolution in the future. However, in view of the latest statements by EU Commission President von der Leyen, there are major doubts: she is calling for even more money for armaments and even more militarization of society.
Christoph Heusgen is to hand over the conference management to the former Norwegian Prime Minister and long-time NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at the end of the MSC 2025. However, as he will now take over the office of Norwegian Finance Minister, it remains unclear when and how Stoltenberg will influence the design of the MSC.
With regard to the war in Ukraine, Jens Stoltenberg has often not been noticed for de-escalating contributions. In October 2024, however, Stoltenberg explicitly spoke out in favor of negotiations and brought a “Finlandization”, i.e. a largely neutral status for Ukraine, into the discussion (Der Freitag, 18.10.2024).
How will Jens Stoltenberg position himself as the new head of the Munich Security Conference? What influence will he have on the orientation of the MSC in times of existing global and additionally developing regional wars and conflicts? What is Stoltenberg’s concept of “security”?
Our MSKv project group celebrated its 20th anniversary in 2024. Since 2004, we have been working to ensure that the security logic at the MSC is replaced by a peace logic. Where were we able to set accents, where were we able to stimulate reflection? What has the work of our small team achieved at all? More about this in our new MSKv newspaper.
Matthias Linnemann, Member of the Board MSKv
Around the Munich Security Conference 2025
Information on events of the peace movement, our association’s activities at the MSC 2025, and our current project newspaper can be found via this link
Thinkmail No. 45 on the MSC publication “But NATO – 10 popular myths about Putin’s war against Ukraine”
Dear friends of peace,
the Munich Security Conference (MSC) publishes well-founded publications to present the military-based foreign and security policy of the NATO states. Conference Director Christoph Heusgen pointed out to us in our last conversation the recent publication “Standard Deviation,” which deals with double standards and double morals of the “West.” And that in an astonishingly critical way for the MSC, even if the violations of the values of the UN Charter are not named with sufficient specificity.
The publication “But NATO – 10 popular myths about Putin’s war against Ukraine” is quite different, both in terms of presentation and content. It is probably intended to be a kind of polemic against the myths and conspiracy theories of extremists and populists, who bring these up in “the emotionally charged discussions.” According to the authors, politics and the public are “not yet practiced in dealing with war,” hence the “Zeitenwende on tour” campaign, for whose accompaniment this publication was written.
To ensure that this practice in dealing with war is as effective as possible, the publication uses a clear black-and-white representation: Each of the 10 myth claims is dualistically opposed to what is correct. One and a half pages of clarification with assertions and also emotional statements are sufficient for this, all with little and questionable reference to sources (e.g. newspaper articles). It seems that it is that simple!
The fact that a war always has extremely complex backgrounds, a conflict genesis that is often not even historically worked through, and that a schematic friend-enemy scheme is unsuitable without considering multi-layered influencing factors and different actors, seems actually trivial. Especially in a conflict that is related to the constellation of nuclear world powers. The meanwhile dominant “Zeitenwende narrative,” constantly repeated by Western politics and the media, therefore by no means represents the irrefutable truth and can equally be regarded as a myth.
At the MSC, an in-depth discussion of these connections, fact-based and with rational argumentation and with the inclusion of different points of view, would have to be conducted in order to counter the myths of any provenance.
What do you think? Do you think such a discussion makes sense? We look forward to hearing your opinion!
With peaceful greetings
Erwin Schelbert
Here you can find our older Denkmails
Denk-Mail No. 32 from 01.09.2021
(Author: Gudrun Haas)
Interrupting the cycle of confrontation and rethinking security
PDF document [600.5 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 31 from 13.06.2021
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
The Peace Report 2021 “Europe can do more” and the Munich Security Conference
PDF document [608.8 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 30 from 12.10.2020
(Author: Ralf Becker)
Shaping realpolitik – providing orientation.
Successful dialogue event with the MSC
PDF document [468.0 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 29 from 17.07.2020
(Author: Thomas Rödl)
Bomb atmosphere – Cold War – New arms race:
A memorandum
PDF document [464.6 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 28 from 11.05.2020
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
Security – not only in Corona times
PDF document [585.5 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 27 from 20.12.2019
(Author: Mechthild Schreiber)
NATO brain dead or brainless?
PDF document [306.9 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 26 from 26.07.2019
(Author: Wolfram Rohde-Liebenau)
Trump’s security policy threatens world peace
PDF document [210.2 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 25 from 01.07.2019
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
The new Peace Report 2019: “Forward into the past? Peace needs partners”
PDF document [356.4 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 24 from 27.11.2018
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“World in Danger”, the book by Wolfgang Ischinger
PDF document [209.5 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 23 from 18.10.2018
(Author: Ralf Becker)
“Rethinking security – from military to civilian security policy”
PDF document [236.1 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 22 from 10.07.2018
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“Wars without end. More diplomacy – less arms exports: The new Peace Report 2018″
PDF document [221.9 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 21 from 19.03.2018
(Author: Anja Ufermann)
“Nuclear Armament”
PDF document [206.8 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 20 from 22.01.2018
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“Armament or logic of peace”
PDF document [222.7 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 19 from 16.11.2017
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“Nuclear Weapons Ban”
PDF document [221.8 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 18 from 01.09.2017
(Author: Thomas Mohr)
“Financing of the MSC by the Foreign Office!”
PDF document [209.6 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 17 from 01.06.2017
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“Further armament in Germany and worldwide?”
PDF document [299.2 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 16 from 09.01.2017
(Author: Anja Ufermann)
“Nonviolent Communication as a side event at the
Munich Security Conference: New perspectives for conflict resolution”
Denk-Mail No. 15 from 11.09.2016
(Author: Gudrun Haas)
“Economic cooperation in Eurasia instead of a course of confrontation”
Denk-Mail No. 14 from 16.06.2016
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“Discuss peace report at the Security Conference”
Denkmail+13_Webseite
Denkmail+13_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [397.7 KB]
Denkmail_12_Webseite
Denkmail_12_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [375.7 KB]
Denkmail_11_Webseite
Denkmail_11_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [76.6 KB]
Denkmail_10_Webseite
Denkmail_10_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [68.5 KB]
Denkmail_9_Webseite
Denkmail_9_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [84.8 KB]
Denkmail_8_Webseite
Denkmail_8_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [53.0 KB]
Denkmail_7_Webseite
Denkmail_7_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [49.5 KB]
Denkmail_6
Denkmail_6.pdf
PDF document [49.4 KB]
Denkmail_5_Webseite
Denkmail_5_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [55.3 KB]
4_Denk_Mail_20140220
4_Denk_Mail_20140220.pdf
PDF document [49.1 KB]
3_Denk_Mail_20131211
3_Denk_Mail_20131211.pdf
PDF document [52.4 KB]
2_Denk_Mail_Webseite-1
2_Denk_Mail_Webseite-1.pdf
PDF document [68.9 KB]
1_Denk_Mail_Webseite
1_Denk_Mail_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [21.6 KB]