Thought Memo No. 48 – Peace or War? Human Ethics for Artificial Intelligence
Ladies and Gentlemen, dear friends of peace,
At the world-renowned Hannover Messe, German defense companies exhibited innovative production technologies “to support the security and defense industry.” Peace activists, scientists, and religious representatives have been warning for years about the danger of war posed by new automated weapon systems and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Instead of arms shows, we need a social dialogue that places AI within the framework of human ethics.
AI is in the process of changing the world: science, economy, geopolitics. The topic also plays a role at the Munich Security Conference (MSC), but with a one-sided focus on military and criminal use. The side event “From Cyberwar to Cyberpeace” proposed by MSKverändern, which addressed the ethical dimensions and peace-promoting potential of AI, was unfortunately not taken up by the conference management.
While AI is analyzed in the context of warfare and the digital competition between great powers, a link to insights from peace ethics, philosophy, and theology has been missing so far. There is also a lack of consideration for perspectives from the Global South. When one considers the global destructive potential of AI and its military and criminal use, this deficit is not just a blind spot, but a veritable security risk.
An intensive dialogue on ethical questions regarding AI would be important—between North, South, East, and West, and between politics, technology, ethics, and religious communities. In this regard, I was impressed by the Vatican’s sober and well-founded analysis: the role of human decisions in AI-supported warfare and the enormous AI resource consumption of energy and water are presented and weighed here (Antiqua et Nova, January 2025).
Experts compare the historical-transformative significance of AI to the invention of the atomic bomb. I call for spending not only vast sums on the military use of AI, but also investing in the peace-building potential of AI, e.g., in education, medicine, ecology, and development cooperation. For AI, too, the following must apply: less readiness for war, more capacity for peace!
And what are your thoughts on “Alexa, ChatGPT and Co.” at the MSC?
Sincerely,
Dr. Peter Bender
Peter Bender is a political scientist and theologian and a member of the board of Religions for Peace
Germany e.V. He regularly participates in the dialogue between MSKverändern and the
Munich Security Conference.
Newsletter No. 25 on the Munich Security Conference 2026
Dear friends of peace,
The 62nd Munich Security Conference (MSC) will take place from February 13-15, 2026. Almost exactly one year ago, US Secretary of State Vance delivered a — to put it mildly — controversial speech at the Bayerischer Hof. It is now more than evident that the US administration intends to cling to the unipolar world order by all means. Relationships with long-standing “partners and friends” in Europe and the immediate vicinity (especially Canada) are being called into question. International law plays virtually no role anymore in the (often violent) enforcement of US interests. Threats and blackmail are being employed, regardless of whether the targets are NATO allies or Venezuela and Iran. While military action has already been taken in Caracas, and military intervention in Iran seems only a matter of time, the EU has once again gotten off with a “slap on the wrist.” However, US President Trump did not hesitate to threaten Denmark, and thus the EU, with the use of military force (“military force is always an option”) should an acceptable “deal” on Greenland not be concluded from the US perspective. This does not bode well for the next three years.
Russia continues its war against Ukraine, which violates international law. The attacks on energy infrastructure are taking a toll on Ukraine. The harsh winter is contributing to the deterioration of living conditions for many Ukrainians. Trump is eyeing the November midterm elections and aims to end the war by summer if possible. The current approach: increasing pressure on Ukraine to accept Moscow’s demands for territorial concessions. The issues of security guarantees for Ukraine, the establishment of demilitarized buffer zones, and the handling of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant remain completely unresolved. Despite ongoing talks, a swift end to this war still does not appear imminent.
The war in Israel/Palestine has led to particularly high casualty figures and massive destruction on the Palestinian side. The US administration brokered a ceasefire a few months ago, which Israel, in particular, has been adhering to rather poorly. There are still almost daily deaths in Gaza. The USA has presented a kind of reconstruction plan for Gaza, in which the Palestinians, however, play virtually no role.
The EU remains largely invisible on the international diplomatic stage. This is primarily due to the role “assigned” to it by the USA. One can only hope that the EU — and thus Germany — will increasingly advocate for balance and conflict resolution in the future, and less for rearmament and militarization. However, EU Commission President von der Leyen recently once again brought up the idea of establishing an EU army. She is setting a course towards the “United States of Europe” to play a larger international role. This does not bode well for peace in Europe.
It is still unclear when Jens Stoltenberg will take over the leadership of the MSC. Therefore, Wolfgang Ischinger will temporarily fill this position again.
The MSC weekend will primarily revolve around the “rules-based international order,” multilateralism, and transatlantic relations. The MSC’s mission is “peace through dialogue.” Unfortunately, this mission is sometimes forgotten: while representatives of the Iranian government were disinvited, the son of the last Shah, Reza Pahlavi, who last set foot on Iranian soil in 1978, received an invitation. According to recent press reports, he will participate in the MSC 2026.
Matthias Linnemann, Co-Chair MSKv
Around the Munich Security Conference 2026
Information on events of the peace movement, the activities of our association at the MSC 2026 and our current project newspaper can be found under this link
09/19/25: Denkmail No. 47 – Nonviolent defense is effective
Dear friends of peace,
The federal government immediately forged a “license for debt” for its start. Conscription, arms expenditure of up to 5% (!) of the money earned by the people in the country, and range threats of weapons determine the discussion. And it is true: The fear of further escalation is real – and understandable. And the narrative of rearmament as the only logical answer is easily grasped. And yet many feel: This doesn’t really feel good.
Peace Congress shows: Nonviolent defense is effective – and inspires people
Over Easter this year, the online congress “Peace is Possible” with over 6000 participants took place in Germany. The intention was to reach people beyond the classic peace movement and to show: Nonviolent alternatives to military rearmament exist, they are tried and tested and effective.
And indeed, this was successful. The events met with enormous interest and resulted in lively resonance, courage and a spirit of optimism. For many, it became clear for the first time or again: Security can also be created through civilian, nonviolent strategies – and it works. This was shown, among others, by Betty Bigombe, Ugandan Minister, and the nonviolent Israeli-Palestinian campaign Combatants for Peace.
What made this congress so powerful was the wide range it spanned – from international politics to concrete peace work to the awareness of a personal inner peace. Political discussions and international diplomacy often remain abstract. The desire for viable alternatives to military logic is great. When people experience themselves as capable of acting, it shows that there is not only the choice between powerless passivity or military action. Feel free to read more at https://friedenistmoeglich.de/
The social openness for this perspective is there – it is waiting to be politically taken up. At the international Munich Peace Meeting of MSKv this October, this will be taken up from the perspective and expertise of 50 peace activists from 21 countries and discussed with the Munich Security Conference. Peace is not a state – it is a decision. Join us?
Sincerely,
Gerhard Rothaupt
Guest author MSKv
Here you can find our older Denkmails
Denk-Mail No. 32 from 01.09.2021
(Author: Gudrun Haas)
Interrupting the cycle of confrontation and rethinking security
PDF document [600.5 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 31 from 13.06.2021
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
The Peace Report 2021 “Europe can do more” and the Munich Security Conference
PDF document [608.8 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 30 from 12.10.2020
(Author: Ralf Becker)
Shaping realpolitik – providing orientation.
Successful dialogue event with the MSC
PDF document [468.0 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 29 from 17.07.2020
(Author: Thomas Rödl)
Bomb atmosphere – Cold War – New arms race:
A memorandum
PDF document [464.6 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 28 from 11.05.2020
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
Security – not only in Corona times
PDF document [585.5 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 27 from 20.12.2019
(Author: Mechthild Schreiber)
NATO brain dead or brainless?
PDF document [306.9 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 26 from 26.07.2019
(Author: Wolfram Rohde-Liebenau)
Trump’s security policy threatens world peace
PDF document [210.2 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 25 from 01.07.2019
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
The new Peace Report 2019: “Forward into the past? Peace needs partners”
PDF document [356.4 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 24 from 27.11.2018
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“World in Danger”, the book by Wolfgang Ischinger
PDF document [209.5 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 23 from 18.10.2018
(Author: Ralf Becker)
“Rethinking security – from military to civilian security policy”
PDF document [236.1 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 22 from 10.07.2018
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“Wars without end. More diplomacy – less arms exports: The new Peace Report 2018″
PDF document [221.9 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 21 from 19.03.2018
(Author: Anja Ufermann)
“Nuclear Armament”
PDF document [206.8 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 20 from 22.01.2018
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“Armament or logic of peace”
PDF document [222.7 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 19 from 16.11.2017
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“Nuclear Weapons Ban”
PDF document [221.8 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 18 from 01.09.2017
(Author: Thomas Mohr)
“Financing of the MSC by the Foreign Office!”
PDF document [209.6 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 17 from 01.06.2017
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“Further armament in Germany and worldwide?”
PDF document [299.2 KB]
Denk-Mail No. 16 from 09.01.2017
(Author: Anja Ufermann)
“Nonviolent Communication as a side event at the
Munich Security Conference: New perspectives for conflict resolution”
Denk-Mail No. 15 from 11.09.2016
(Author: Gudrun Haas)
“Economic cooperation in Eurasia instead of a course of confrontation”
Denk-Mail No. 14 from 16.06.2016
(Author: Erwin Schelbert)
“Discuss peace report at the Security Conference”
Denkmail+13_Webseite
Denkmail+13_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [397.7 KB]
Denkmail_12_Webseite
Denkmail_12_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [375.7 KB]
Denkmail_11_Webseite
Denkmail_11_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [76.6 KB]
Denkmail_10_Webseite
Denkmail_10_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [68.5 KB]
Denkmail_9_Webseite
Denkmail_9_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [84.8 KB]
Denkmail_8_Webseite
Denkmail_8_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [53.0 KB]
Denkmail_7_Webseite
Denkmail_7_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [49.5 KB]
Denkmail_6
Denkmail_6.pdf
PDF document [49.4 KB]
Denkmail_5_Webseite
Denkmail_5_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [55.3 KB]
4_Denk_Mail_20140220
4_Denk_Mail_20140220.pdf
PDF document [49.1 KB]
3_Denk_Mail_20131211
3_Denk_Mail_20131211.pdf
PDF document [52.4 KB]
2_Denk_Mail_Webseite-1
2_Denk_Mail_Webseite-1.pdf
PDF document [68.9 KB]
1_Denk_Mail_Webseite
1_Denk_Mail_Webseite.pdf
PDF document [21.6 KB]