Matthias Linnemann

Peace Prayer of Religions

The Interreligious Prayer for Peace takes place on Sunday evening after the Security Conference concludes: Jews, Christians, Muslims, Baháʼís, and Buddhists pray for peace. A truly contemplative opportunity to find peace at the end of the Security Conference weekend.

Date: Sunday, February 16, 2025, 6:30 PM
Location: St. Bonifaz Parish Center, Karlstr. 34, Munich-Maxvorstadt (Königsplatz subway station)

Further information can be found here: Interreligious Prayer for Peace – Munich Peace Conference

Peace Prayer of Religions Read More »

Our Munich Peace Meeting 2024

The 6th Munich Peace Meeting (MPM), initiated and organized by MSKv, took place on November 29, 2024. The participants from the fields of peace science, peace movement, and peace work exchanged views with Dr. Benedikt Franke and other representatives of the MSC on current security and peace policy challenges.

Together, concrete proposals for the 2025 conference were developed. We are very excited to see what activities MSC has derived from this.

A brief report on the MPM 2024 can be found here: MPM_2024

Our Munich Peace Meeting 2024 Read More »

Thinkmail No. 45 on the MSC publication “But NATO – 10 popular myths about Putin’s war against Ukraine”

Dear friends of peace,

the Munich Security Conference (MSC) publishes well-founded publications to present the military-based foreign and security policy of the NATO states. Conference Director Christoph Heusgen pointed out to us in our last conversation the recent publication “Standard Deviation,” which deals with double standards and double morals of the “West.” And that in an astonishingly critical way for the MSC, even if the violations of the values of the UN Charter are not named with sufficient specificity.

The publication “But NATO – 10 popular myths about Putin’s war against Ukraine” is quite different, both in terms of presentation and content. It is probably intended to be a kind of polemic against the myths and conspiracy theories of extremists and populists, who bring these up in “the emotionally charged discussions.” According to the authors, politics and the public are “not yet practiced in dealing with war,” hence the “Zeitenwende on tour” campaign, for whose accompaniment this publication was written.

To ensure that this practice in dealing with war is as effective as possible, the publication uses a clear black-and-white representation: Each of the 10 myth claims is dualistically opposed to what is correct. One and a half pages of clarification with assertions and also emotional statements are sufficient for this, all with little and questionable reference to sources (e.g. newspaper articles). It seems that it is that simple!

The fact that a war always has extremely complex backgrounds, a conflict genesis that is often not even historically worked through, and that a schematic friend-enemy scheme is unsuitable without considering multi-layered influencing factors and different actors, seems actually trivial. Especially in a conflict that is related to the constellation of nuclear world powers. The meanwhile dominant “Zeitenwende narrative,” constantly repeated by Western politics and the media, therefore by no means represents the irrefutable truth and can equally be regarded as a myth.

At the MSC, an in-depth discussion of these connections, fact-based and with rational argumentation and with the inclusion of different points of view, would have to be conducted in order to counter the myths of any provenance.

What do you think? Do you think such a discussion makes sense? We look forward to hearing your opinion!

With peaceful greetings
Erwin Schelbert

Thinkmail No. 45 on the MSC publication “But NATO – 10 popular myths about Putin’s war against Ukraine” Read More »

We mourn the passing of Mechthild Schreiber, the honorary chairwoman of our association.

 

 

 

Mechthild Schreiber was very closely associated with our association from the very beginning, even though she was not among the founding members.

At the general meeting on 2015-03-27, she was formally admitted as a member, and at the general meeting on 2017-03-27, she was elected to the association’s board. She then served on the board without interruption until the general meeting on 2024-04-13, where she was unanimously elected honorary chairwoman of the association.

Among her many important contributions to our association, I would like to mention just a few of her most recent ones: For the celebration of the 20th anniversary of our first “Call for a Change in the Security Conference” in April 2024, she played a significant role in the preparation and also moderated the event. Most recently, in July 2024, we were able to meet at her home for a pleasant evening of political discussions on her terrace. A few days ago, Mechthild passed away at the age of 94 – quite suddenly and unexpectedly for us.

Mechthild was – with her sociology studies and her intensive engagement with women’s research and feminism – a clever and widely informed woman. We lose a very credible pacifist, a courageous and upright fighter for the cause of peace. Her dedicated contributions will be greatly missed!

In February 2021, Mechthild wrote in one of her regular contributions to our annual project newspaper – which she had also very credibly presented in a conversation with MSC Conference Director W. Ischinger:
“I know what war means, as I experienced it painfully as a child: the wailing of sirens that tore us from our sleep, the thunder of the FLAK, the anti-aircraft guns, the anxious hours in the cellar during air raids: will it hit us this time? Or will we still escape? The incendiary bombs that one night actually destroyed our apartment in Berlin, the familiar home of my childhood; the loss of my father, who never returned from a trip to our pastor, and whose abduction and death in a Polish prisoner-of-war camp my mother and I only learned about two years later… For many years, the people said: ‘Never again war!’ And today it can only mean: ‘Si vis pacem para pacem!’ If you want peace, prepare for peace!”

Further information on Mechthild’s life and commitment can be found via the following links:

In memoriam Mechthild Schreiber, Peace Activist

forumZFD – Farewell to a Peace Fighter

Listen persistently

Cultural regulars’ table with Mechthild Schreiber

The members of the “Changing the Munich Security Conference” Project Group e.V. will always fondly remember their long-standing chairwoman and honorary chairwoman Mechthild Schreiber.

Mechthild, we will miss you!

Munich, 2024-10-11

Thomas Mohr
Chairman

We mourn the passing of Mechthild Schreiber, the honorary chairwoman of our association. Read More »

10/10/2024: “Rethinking Security” – a concept for peace capability instead of war capability.

As part of this year’s Munich Peace Weeks, the project group “Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz verändern e.V.” cordially invites you to a presentation followed by a discussion:
Thu. 21.11. – 7:00 PM, EineWeltHaus, Room 108

with: Erwin Schelbert, Gudrun Haas, Markus Brunnhuber, Hubert Heindl
Organizer: Project group “Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz verändern e.V.”

Further information can be found here:

 

 

 

 

10/10/2024: “Rethinking Security” – a concept for peace capability instead of war capability. Read More »

09/04/2024: Denkmail No. 44 – An uninhabitable Earth or a “Century of Tolerance” (R.D. Precht)?

Dear friends of peace,

At our first meeting with MSC Director Ambassador Christoph Heusgen in March 2022, it became clear that he – especially as a former representative of Germany on the UN Security Council – is greatly concerned with the norms of international law and a value-oriented international policy.

Richard David Precht addresses the question of how a value-led foreign policy can be effective in his current book “Century of Tolerance.” He joins the appeals of scientists that preventing climate catastrophe must become the main topic of politics so that people can still lead a life worth living on Earth in the 22nd century. This requires a joint effort by humanity, which is existentially necessary. We can no longer afford another century of escalation, armaments, and world wars! It would be the end of human life.

Precht questions the claims of a “systemic rivalry” between the West and China and the “struggle of democracies against autocracies.” He points out how easily we fall into friend-enemy thinking – us, the good guys, against the evil others – and how selectively we evaluate autocratic regimes, depending on whether they cooperate with us, the West. And Precht emphasizes how little the preaching of “Western values” can convince, especially in the Global South, when this West itself has so often not adhered to these norms – and does not adhere to them! All too often, the West pretends to have values where it is really about its own interests. Instead, a look at the common value foundation of cultures – e.g. “Global Ethos” according to Hans Küng – and global cooperation on an equal footing would be necessary.

I believe that with his theses – only touched upon here – Precht could make an important contribution on the stage of the MSC next February. I would like to inform Mr. Heusgen of this during our online meeting next week.

What do you think of this proposal?

Sincerely,

Thomas Mohr
Chairman Project Group “Changing the Munich Security Conference” e.V.
Chairman gewaltfrei grün e.V.

09/04/2024: Denkmail No. 44 – An uninhabitable Earth or a “Century of Tolerance” (R.D. Precht)? Read More »

July 8, 2024: Newsletter No. 43 – The Peace Report 2024 – Serving the Logic of War?

Dear friends of peace,

“World Without a Compass” is the title of the new Peace Report (FGA) by the four leading peace research institutes. That, at least, appears to be a very accurate analysis.

It is certainly correct and important to note that the year 2023 recorded a sad record in wars and conflicts, an insane peak of 2.4 trillion dollars in worldwide armaments spending, and was also the climatologically hottest year to date.

Not enough: On Europe’s doorstep, two senseless, murderous wars are raging in Ukraine and Gaza, in which we are also involved.

In this situation, shouldn’t peace research provide a clear impetus for an end to violence, an indispensable, clear guide to peace that requires a radical departure from the previous logic of war? Because violence, hatred, and rearmament only ever provoke a spiral of new violence?

Instead, the report’s recommendations state: “To enable negotiations in the war in Ukraine, military support for Ukraine must be sustainably guaranteed and increased.” And since the USA is expected to reduce its support, the demand is: “Europe must compensate for this decline, and that also means it must rapidly increase its armaments capacities.”

This reflects the same military security thinking that has been proclaimed for years at the Munich Security Conference (MSC) by the leading representatives of highly armed states. Its head, Christoph Heusgen, sets the tone: “We must return to a certain logic, as we had in the Cold War,” and he believes he must urge Western states to “expand their military support for Ukraine,” stating that the West must “go all out” with its military aid.

This fits into the general political and societal war hysteria of a so-called “Zeitenwende” (turning point). Sociologist Andreas Reckwitz sees in this an “increasing friend-foe thinking,” “everywhere there is a new culture of mercilessness.”

Should we still uphold our earlier demand to prominently discuss the FGA’s recommendations at the MSC? Or is it precisely now that we should?

What do you think about this? We look forward to hearing your views!

With peaceful regards
Erwin Schelbert
Founding Member of MSKverändern e.V.
Study Group for Peace Research

July 8, 2024: Newsletter No. 43 – The Peace Report 2024 – Serving the Logic of War? Read More »

12/10/2023: Denkmail No. 40

Dear peace activists,

“A highly armed army, ever more isolation and surveillance, does not provide more security for Israel. That is the lesson of the terrible terror of October 7,” according to an ARD commentary from October 25, 2023.

The Combatants for Peace, former fighters from Israel and Palestine, state: “As part of this centuries-old violent conflict, we know its price and futility. More than ever in the past, we assert today: There is no military solution to the conflict; violence begets violence; revenge fuels revenge.”

Gideon Levy of the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz expressed this in the Tagesthemen interview on November 7, 2023: “There is only a perspective for the future if the international community turns to Israel and the Palestinians to say, ‘Enough is enough. Now is the time for a solution.’ You need something that is fundamentally just for the Palestinians as well. Otherwise, we will never be safe.”

Russia is also currently failing with its war in Ukraine due to its military security logic. However, Ukraine and NATO have also failed to ensure lasting security through further expansion of NATO.

However, we can learn from the experiences in the Middle East, Ukraine, Afghanistan and Mali, as well as from positive experiences in Kenya, Somalia and elsewhere.

Germany should use its power for the sustainable overcoming of the spirals of trauma and violence through joint security structures – in the Middle East in the form of a Conference for Security and Cooperation in the Middle East (KSZMNO).

As the Rethinking Security initiative, we have published these and other impulses “Rethinking Security Structures” in a current paper, which can be found on our homepage sicherheitneudenken.de.

We look forward to your approval and/or your suggestions: Do you also think that these impulses would enrich the MSC? Please send an email to vorstand@mskveraendern.de

With warm greetings,

Ralf Becker

Coordinator of the Rethinking Security Initiative

12/10/2023: Denkmail No. 40 Read More »

Scroll to Top